Ask For Links, Because You Can’t Rank Without Them

David Farkas 25 comments

How good is the best website in the world if no one ever sees it?

Is it still the best website in the world?

Let’s get sidetracked for a second.

Imagine the best movie ever made.

It has great acting, authentic costumes, dialogue that’s both realistic and witty, romance, humor and an epic scene where a news helicopter chases a rogue ice cream truck across a frozen river.

Sounds great, doesn’t it?

Well, it’s only a great movie if someone sees it.

Imagine the producers of the best film in the world never asked anyone to see their movie.

No one ever heard about it because they never invited anyone to view a screening.

The only people to ever see the greatest piece of cinema ever created were the people that created it.

It’s a tragic hypothetical story, but it’s a story that applies to hundreds of thousands of websites.

No one ever sees them in search results because they have no links; and they have no links because they never asked for any.

Links are the difference between popularity and invisibility.

No matter how many people badmouth SEO and link building, websites just don’t tend to rank without good, relevant links.

The rhetoric surrounding link building changes all the time.

It often falls in and out of favor, and processes are constantly refined by the best minds in search marketing.

It doesn’t matter what the latest buzzwords are, though— links still matter.

Cyrus Shepard wrote a post for Moz called “Can You Rank in Google Without Links? New Data Says Slim Chance.”

Moz studied the first 50 search results for around 15,000 keywords. Here’s what they found:

“Out of the top results, a full 99.2% of all websites had at least one external link. (The remaining .8% is well within the margin of error expected between Mozscape and Google’s own link index.) The study found almost no websites ranking for competitive search phrases that didn’t have at least a single external link pointing at them, and most had significantly more links.”

A whopping 99% of websites ranking for competitive keywords had at least one external link. Most of them have many more. What more? Google themselves recently confirmed that links are one of the top ranking factors.

That’s certainly something to think about, right?

Before you start thinking about how you can gobble up as many links as possible, let’s take a step back for a moment.

There are good links and there are bad links. Bad links come from spammy websites, irrelevant websites, unsecure websites and robot-curated directories that no human has ever laid eyes upon.

Good links come from relevant websites and they’re created and constantly monitored by human beings. If you build a dozen spammy links to your site, you might not get penalized– but you surely won’t see any improvement in your search rankings either.

Your links need to be relevant. Every link has to be thoughtful. Every link has to be something that makes sense– something a human being would actually click on.

Here’s Cyrus again:

“… most people would be surprised to learn how many links don’t actually help you to rank, or can actually hurt. To play within Google’s good graces, it’s best to understand Google’s guidelines on manipulative link building, and knowing what types of links to avoid.

The safest link building is simply link earning, and to get your content in front of the right people.”

But we’re getting to that old conundrum of link earning vs. link building again. If you never, ever ask for a link (aka build a link) in the first place, how will anyone ever find out about your site? After all, it would be impossible for someone to link to a website that they don’t even know exists?

Content marketing experts can talk about ‘compelling content’ and ‘link earning’ until they’re blue in the face, but webmasters can’t link to a website that they can’t find.

You need to get your website in front of the right people.

Link earning, link building, public relations, content promotion; call it what you will. It’s still just fine to ask for links, as long as you don’t violate Google’s link schemes guidelines.

Don’t let anyone prod you into panic.

So, we have the Moz data and it’s pretty incredible. Ranking in Google means at least one or two external links to your site. There are other factors, too, of course (including usability, ease of navigation, content, etc.), but we’re going to focus on links for now.

And, you know what?  Depending on your niche you might only need a few to see your web traffic increase. A few quality links are better than no links or a dozen spammy links.

I ran a few local dental practice websites and the results speak for themselves.

The number one organic search result for “Lakewood NJ dentist” is, at the time of this writing, Lakewood Family Dental.

OSE says Lakewood Family Dental has 94 links from 17 total domains. For the moment, let’s focus on the number of linking domains, because that’s usually more important than the sheer number of links that a website has.

More from Cyrus:

“It seems obvious, but the study confirmed the long-standing correlation between higher rankings and the number of external links found from unique websites.

Indeed, out of all the data points the ranking correlation study looked at, the number of unique websites linking to a page was one of the highest correlated relationships we found.”

17 domains isn’t a ton. If you think about it, that number is totally doable. You can see yourself asking 17 different websites for a link.

But how relevant are Lakewood Family Dental’s links?

It looks like most of them are pretty good. There are a few domains on the list that aren’t so relevant, but chances are those links were built before Google’s algorithms really started cracking down on spam, garbage and irrelevant hyperlinks.

Lakewood Family Dental mostly has links from other dental-related websites. They don’t have a ton of them, but they rank really well for a pretty good search string. They asked for some relevant links and it paid off.

Let’s look at another example– Madison Dental. Madison Dental is still on page one for “Lakewood NJ dentist,” but they’re a few results behind Lakewood Family Dental.

Here’s their report from OSE:

That’s a lot of links coming from very few domains. Let’s dig a little deeper.

All of those links come from one website (The Lakewood Scoop), which is relevant because it’s Lakewood-based. There are some strange things happening here in terms of the disproportionate amount of links per domain, but that’s a story for another blog post.

Instead, let’s just focus on the relevancy: it’s there. A local Lakewood blog is linking to a local Lakewood business.

However, Lakewood Family Dental has external links from more linking domains. They have a greater variety of relevant links, which is why they’re ranking above the competition.

Let’s take a look at one more example. Leisure Dental is hovering around page three for the same search string; their visibility is not great.

According to OSE, they have one link from one domain; a directory link. It’s still relevant, but it can’t compete with what Lakewood Family (or even Madison) has.

Dentists reside in a fairly competitive niche, but the evidence here shows that a thoughtful, well-planned link building campaign can work wonders for any website that wants to rank higher.

It really is possible to rank much better in Google with a handful of good, relevant links.

Once you start asking for links, your site will naturally rank better– and you won’t suffer the fate of our hypothetical best movie in the world.

If you want to rank in Google, then you need links. And if you want links, you’re going to have to ask for them.

Get out there and start asking.

Comments

  • Niyi

    Great article. I strongly believe that without quality links, ranking high will be next-to-impossible.

    Having said that, Google also takes other factors into consideration.

    great job David!

    • David Farkas

      Glad you enjoyed it, Niyi. I agree that there are other ranking factors, but the Moz data proves that links continue to play a leading role in the SERPs.

  • Jamie

    Great point Dave, I couldn’t agree more. The worst thing that can happen if you ask is that you get a no, but each no gets you closer to a yes.
    Well done

    • David Farkas

      Thanks Jamie and I’m glad you enjoyed it.

      You’re 100% correct that there is no harm done if a link request gets turned down. It’s part of the game and doesn’t justify not reaching out and asking.

  • Chris White

    Great article David, nice to see someone talking about how useful links still are and the ways they’re measured rather than screaming at us to stop link building! Solutions are always much more useful than scaremongering and repurposing the “warnings” from Google et al

    • David Farkas

      I appreciate that Chris!

      You hit the nail on the head, and there never seems to be a shortage of FUD to go around.

  • Eric Ward

    David – You have put a lot of research and time into this article. And it shows. I find the article to be quite useful and interesting, at the same time I think it’s important for people to remember that there are several third party providers of background data all of whom can give us tremendous insights into tactics techniques and strategies we may want to consider for our clients. MOZ is outstanding. That said we must remember that these third-party data providers are still just proxies for Google. In other words, nobody can know and nobody can ever know what Google knows about our links, both current and past. Google can invest a truly unlimited amount of resources into analyzing as much of the web as it wants to, whereas third party data providers have to make hard decisions about just how much and which parts of the web they are going to index and analyze for links. This is why as much as I love getting as much background data from as many sources as I can, but when it comes down to actually creating and implementing and executing linking strategies for clients, this data is just part of the plan.

    • David Farkas

      Hey Eric,

      It’s an honor to have you stop in and I appreciate the kind words!

      You’re bringing up an excellent point about the limited resources of third party data providers compared to Google. That’s just one of the reasons you shouldn’t consider third party tools and metrics the be-all and end-all of link building. Ultimately the link has to be relevant and make sense regardless of what numbers are associated with it.

  • Jimmy

    Its hard to get quality link from relevant websites for many industries….including dental as seen above. I wouldn’t call articles sites good by any strech of the imagination.

  • Britney

    I could not have said it better myself!

  • Alex

    Thanks for your explanations. It’s really great david. You’ve said is 100% true.

  • Amy

    There’s certainly a lot to learn about this topic and I love all the points you have made.

  • Samantha

    Love this article and look forward to reading more content from you.

  • Teren C

    Finally found exactly what I ԝas looking for! Great job at explaining the necessity of links! God Blesѕ you David.

  • Ann Sloan

    Simply want too say your article is as astounding. The clearness in your post is simply great and i can assume you are clearly an expert at building links.

  • Micah

    Awesome stuff and crazy how people still question the importance of links.

  • Karal

    I absolutely love this article and especially the analogy about how good is the best movie if no one ever sees it 🙂

  • Rosita

    Thanks for this wonderful post.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *